Prior Year Decision History: Learning from Past Declinations, Wins, and Losses
Before quoting a submission, know whether you've seen this insured before — and what happened last time.
The Problem
A D&O submission arrives for Solaris Energy Holdings. The UW starts a fresh review — not realizing the same insured was declined last year for ESG litigation risk, and the year before that the account was quoted but lost to a competitor. That history should inform the current decision: is the situation different now? Should we re-engage? Or are the same red flags still present?
Without historical context, every submission is treated as brand new — even when it isn't.
The InsightUW Approach
InsightUW automatically surfaces prior year decisions for the same insured whenever a submission detail is opened. The panel shows all previous submissions, their outcomes (bound, quoted, declined, lost), decline reasons, and a prioritization recommendation.
Three Prioritization Contexts
| Context | Trigger | Recommendation | Color |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returning Client | Had prior bound submission | "Prioritize for retention" | Green |
| Previously Declined | Had prior declination | "Review prior decline reasons before quoting" | Amber |
| New Insured | No prior history | "Standard processing" | Gray |
Prior Decisions Panel
For each prior submission, the panel shows:
- Status badge — bound (green), quoted (blue), declined (red), lost (amber)
- LOB and broker — may differ from current submission
- Year and limit — for trend analysis
- Decline detail — if previously declined, shows the reason
- Link — click to open the prior submission
Broker History
Separate from the insured, the system also tracks broker patterns:
- Hit ratio — % of submissions that resulted in bound policies
- Decline ratio — % that were declined
- By LOB — which lines the broker submits most, and their success rate
LOB-Specific Example
D&O for Solaris Energy Holdings (2026):
The prior decisions panel shows:
| Year | LOB | Status | Limit | Broker | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | D&O | Quoted | $15M | Lockton | Lost — competitor offered lower premium |
| 2024 | D&O | Declined | $10M | Lockton | ESG litigation risk + CFO departure |
Prioritization context: "Previously declined — review prior decline reasons before quoting."
The UW now knows: (1) Lockton has submitted this account 3 years running, showing persistence; (2) the 2024 decline was for ESG litigation — is that still pending?; (3) the 2025 quote was lost on price — is there room to compete this year?
What This Means for Underwriters
- Context before action — know the insured's history before investing time in a review
- Decline reasons visible — if previously declined, see exactly why and assess if conditions changed
- Returning client flag — renewal/retention accounts get prioritized automatically
- Broker patterns — understand whether this broker's submissions align with your appetite
- Cross-year analysis — spot trends (improving financials, resolved litigation, persistent red flags)
What's Next
Next: AI Research Assistant — Proactive Intelligence During the Underwriting Process
Want to see prior year decisions on every submission? Request a demo.